From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve tax-related articles to a feature-quality standard. |
Assessment ratings and other indicators given below are used by the Project in prioritizing and managing its workload. |
Stub |
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. |
Low |
This article has been rated as Low-priority on the Project's priority scale. |
|
|
After rating the article, please provide a short summary on the article's comments page to explain your ratings and/or identify the strengths and weaknesses. |
[edit] Random thoughts
Later, this article can be reworked to delete the long quote from the syllabus. The fact summary can be reworked. There probably also needs to be a more specific brief description of the procedural history and the precise issues presented to and decided by the Court. Famspear (talk) 18:13, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
- There is a great article written by Bernie Wolfman that I just read. It is riveting. I also have some correspondence between S.G. Erwin Griswold and Wolfman. Hammer of the year (talk) 00:37, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- Dear Hammer of the year: Sounds like you have material! Famspear (talk) 02:37, 13 December 2007 (UTC)