Talk:Frank LoBiondo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Frank LoBiondo is part of WikiProject U.S. Congress, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the United States Congress.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.
person	This article is about one (or many) person(s).

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

This page is about an active politician who is running for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.

	NJ Portal Frank LoBiondo is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Bulletin: The next New York City meetup is Sunday June 1st.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Does anyone else think that the section on Political Philosphy is biased? While what is there is factually correct the general tone of the section is of a negative connotation. Also the author of that section seems to have omitted much information (i.e. his record on the environment). --K. Ritter

I noticed that. The section above says he's in a moderate group. Added to that you're right that his environmental scores are good. The League of Conservation Voters gave him a 78% and the American Wilderness Coalition was even more positive.[1] Even going by the League's view he scores higher than Daniel Akaka.--T. Anthony 08:56, 5 June 2006 (UTC)