Talk:Frank Crumit

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Ohio Portal Frank Crumit is part of WikiProject Ohio, which collaborates on Ohio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to current discussions.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Please rate this article, and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
Suggested article edit guidelines: To help us prioritise our workload, and in readiness for Wikipedia:1.0, we need to assess our articles for Quality. If this article is Unassessed, please assess it. See the Article Classification for instructions. If you disagree with a rating, you can change it or discuss it at Article Classification. After assessing this article's quality, please make sure it to add it to the Lists at Article Classification, following the grading scheme detailed there.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to musicians and musical groups on Wikipedia.

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

[edit] Gracyk Biography

note to Infrogmation - thanks for locating this and pointing out that it was copyright. However, in future you might adopt a less accusatorial tone. I posted the information in good faith; it was sent to me as public domain. You might also be more careful when undoing one edit not to undo others at the same time, which I have now had to redo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.102.138.149 (talk • contribs)

Hi. If there was something you wrote that was not a copyright violation you'd like to re add, you can find old edits in the article history. I reverted your edits as a whole as the main change I saw was addition of substantial material that seemed to be a copyright violation, and a quick google search on a sample found the source. We have to take copyright violations seriously here, as they are both contrary ot Wikipedia's goal of creating a free content encyclopedia and can open the project up to legal challenges. Check out the links I left on your talk page for some more tips. If you decide to stick around, you might wish to choose a user name and log in. By the way, I think you'll find from the original 78s that "The Prune Song"/"Song of the Prune" was issued under both titles (and I know he recorded it more than once). Cheers, -- Infrogmation 17:02, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

"I reverted your edits as a whole" Only one of the edits involved copyright violation. There were no grounds whatever for reverting the others, other than your own laziness and arrogance. You need to familiarise yourself a bit better with Wikipedia policy before you go pontificating to others.217.42.13.130 12:42, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Hello, please don't take things personally. Wikipedia needs to be a bit agressive in removing copyright violations, and if you add material containing material I easily verified as containing violations I don't need to sort through it sentence by sentance to see if there is any non-copyright material before reverting. I assume putting in copyrighted material was a simple new user mistake. Once you understand the importance of not violating copyrights here, you are welcome to put back contributions which are your own words. My invitation for you to stick around, log in, and help improve articles was and is sincere; just please refrain from name calling. Sorry if I sounded curt with you; if you don't understand an action of mine in my interaction with you, feel free to ask. "Laziness"? Well, this is a collective effort and you are welcome to add your industry to improving it. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 17:09, 11 November 2007 (UTC)