Talk:Francisco Coimbre

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Francisco Coimbre was a good article nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. Reviewed version: March 19, 2008

	Puerto Rico Portal Francisco Coimbre is part of WikiProject Puerto Rico, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the people, history, language, and culture of Puerto Rico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help with the tasks listed below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. Please do not substitute this template.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject Puerto Rico To-do: edit Article requests: Art of Puerto Rico, Lourdes Chacón, Laws of Puerto Rico, Central Fajardo, El Verde more Cleanup: Mona, Puerto Rico, Vieques, Puerto Rico, Ponce Massacre, Morovis, Puerto Rico, Bayamón, Puerto Rico, Caguas, Puerto Rico Verify: Dominican illegal immigration to Puerto Rico, Biographic articles tagged with {{sources}} see List of Puerto Ricans. Puerto Rican Spanish Wikify: Expand: Public welfare in Puerto Rico, Culture of Puerto Rico, Demographics of Puerto Rico, Geology of Puerto Rico, Government of Puerto Rico, Education in Puerto Rico, Communications in Puerto Rico, Public housing in Puerto Rico, University of Puerto Rico more Merge: Category Sorting: Images needed:

[edit] GA Review

I'm reviewing the article now, and I'll be posting my review shortly. Noble Story (talk) 01:55, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Here's my review for the article

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   The article is not up to GA-quality in this respect. There are numerous mistakes in grammar and prose (most notably using "on" instead of "in"). It seems to be written by a non-native English speaker (no offense to the editors, but I'm being blunt). The writing has to be improved before it can be promoted.

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   This is another aspect in which the article fails. There are many statements that are unsourced.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

1. Overall: Pass or Fail:

   Usually I put an article on hold and try to help the nominator in correcting the article, but I think the edits are too large here to be done in a short amount of time. Try going back and correcting the prose, and adding citations to statements that need them.

Noble Story (talk) 10:20, 19 March 2008 (UTC)