Talk:Francis William Reitz/Comments
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Upgraded quality from Stub to B in conformity with independent rating to B in ProjectBiography.Makeshift Thackery (talk) 14:44, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] GA review
Article has been peer reviewed and satisfactorily upgraded and copy-edited, then nominated for GA-status. Checklist:
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article is without doubt a Good Article.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Congratulations on achieving GA-status
- Pass or Fail:
Makeshift Thackery (talk) 08:49, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
