Talk:Francis Seow

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.

	Francis Seow is part of SGpedians' Resources An attempt to better coordinate and organise articles related to Singapore. To participate, simply edit this page or visit our noticeboard for more info.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Even though I think it is not neutral, far worse is that fact that it is a poorly written entry. Victortan 15:52, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

Keeps asserting a certain dialogue with little elaboration, not neutral. Even though I detest the PAP myself, the way the article presents the facts would turn any reader off.

i think without any sources and references it is problematic Chensiyuan 23:43, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unrelated content

I suggest that we remove the section Alleged influence on America and perhaps move it to another article(perhaps the developmental state)? Aside of this, I think it does not quote any sources and therefore is highly suspect. --Ghormax 13:29, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Since when is Francis Yeow OXBRIDGE and HARVARD educated?? I doubt he did his degrees in Oxford and Cambridge.

I agree that "Alleged influence on America" is best omitted since it has little relevance.--K.J. 20:26, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

• I cleaned up the influence section a bit and tried to make it less blatantly contentious, but it's still far from balanced. I agree that it's not all that relevant either, it seems like someone just shoehorned it in so they could gripe about Republicans. If no one comes up with a good reason to keep it within the next few days, I say it should go. -- Colm O'Brien 17:49, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

I think the Francis Seow entry needs to be cleaned up but it should stay - it's an important small part of the bigger topic area ("political dissidents in Singapore") - dg, 23:12, 7 May 2006