Talk:Francis Sant-Cassia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Why has this been cut and put into deletion??
The original article was perfect.??
- Having briefly looked at the page history, the original was written from the first person, which is unencyclopedic. Early indication shows on vfd that this is an encyclopedic topic, just badly written: perhaps you could re-write what is there so that it fits better into Wikipedia's manual of style. -- Graham ☺ | Talk 20:23, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
The new version contains all the facts of the original, minus the opinion. As you see, there were not many facts in the original, and a lot of opinion -- which is probably why it was put on VfD. --BM 20:25, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
[edit] VFD decision
I think this article needs to be tidied up. There is not a lot substantiated in it. Ampersand77 (talk) 03:52, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
This article was proposed for deletion January 2005. The discussion is archived at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Francis Sant-Cassia. Joyous 02:19, Jan 20, 2005 (UTC)