Talk:Francis Chichester

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Biography     (Rated Start-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. Biography Portal Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] WikiProject Devon     (Rated Start-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics connected with Devon. If you would like to participate, you can visit the WikiProject Devon project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the priority scale.

Hi, I put the second link away, because i think is not the good one. CaptainHaddock 15:03, 7 November 2005 (UTC) Added another link, and material about his flying career. USER:Winstonwolfe

---

• While rectifying a few grammatical points (there may be some hypercorrection in there, sorry; one can revert it if necessary), I noticed the phrase "now considered to be a macrobiotic diet". Now, I was wondering whether this meant "now considered to have been a macrobiotic diet" or "now considered a macrobiotic diet" (I know that it is a pedantic point, but I thought that it was ambiguous; is it referring to the diet's having been a macrobiotic diet and that that has only recently been considered/discovered or is it referring to the fact that it is only considered macrobiotic in modern terminology? By the way, "consider" doesn't need to have "to be" with it, if one cannot see the point I am making).

--Steven Weston 20:03, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

The name of the author (Anita Leslie) of the Chichester biography and Chichester's name in the title citation are both misspelled. Just typos. I tried to edit, but can't seem to get onto that page. I just finished reading the book this morning. It's excellent. 24.86.132.252 00:16, 3 September 2007 (UTC)Chuck Davis, September 2, 2007