From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
FP-45 Liberator is part of WikiProject Ohio, which collaborates on Ohio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to current discussions. |
Start |
This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. |
??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
Please rate this article, and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
|
Suggested article edit guidelines:
- To help us prioritise our workload, and in readiness for Wikipedia:1.0, we need to assess our articles for Quality. If this article is Unassessed, please assess it. See the Article Classification for instructions. If you disagree with a rating, you can change it or discuss it at Article Classification.
- After assessing this article's quality, please make sure it to add it to the Lists at Article Classification, following the grading scheme detailed there.
|
|
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Firearms; If you would like to join us, please visit the project page where you can find a list of open tasks. If you have any questions, please consult the FAQ. |
??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. |
Additional information: |
|
|
|
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status:
- Referencing and citation: not checked
- Coverage and accuracy: not checked
- Structure: not checked
- Grammar: not checked
- Supporting materials: not checked
|
|
[edit] anecdote
I got to handle one once. The owner said he knew someone who fired one until it broke (the backplate came off, i think). It took 17 rounds. —Tamfang 04:36, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
- Doesn't suprise me a bit--it's basically a mass produced zip gun and designed to be disposable. Since they came packaged with 10 rounds, falling apart after 17 means that it was just right--neither underengineered nor significantly overengineered. scot 14:05, 24 August 2006 (UTC)