Talk:Foxtons
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Hang on
I don't think that this qualifies as an article consisting solely of links. Could it be substituted with a Prod if there is still the issue outstanding, as this article could easily be improved.
JASpencer (talk) 20:44, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- Doesn't look like a speedy to me, as long as it gets expanded fairly quickly.--uɐɔlnʌɟoʞǝɹɐs 20:49, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- There was an older article here that I did not realise had been deleted. An administrator should look at merging histories. Catchpole (talk) 20:53, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- That would be good. JASpencer (talk) 20:59, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- I no longer support the deletion of this article (I'm the one who added the speedy) as it now actually has substance. Thanks for being one of the few to follow proper {{hangon}} procedure on the matter.--Oni Ookami AlfadorTalk|@ 21:10, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- That would be good. JASpencer (talk) 20:59, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- There was an older article here that I did not realise had been deleted. An administrator should look at merging histories. Catchpole (talk) 20:53, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
A very biast view i think, this should be a proper page like any other large company would have ie. cocacola ect. Can this not be changed to be a bit more objective and informative? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.151.20.91 (talk) 20:58, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
18 April 2008
- We (Foxtons) have updated the page about Foxtons as it had little information about the company and its history (in comparison to other companies' pages). If these changes are acceptable we will add further information in the future. We have tried to remain unbiased and have kept the original content on the page.
