Talk:FoxPro 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of Computing WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to computers and computing. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received an rating on the importance scale.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Databases.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale.

Please help improve this article or section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. (January 2007)

[edit] name to save this page under.

Looking for opinions... when I decided to start this page last night, I could not think of a name to save this page under. FoxPro and Foxpro were redirects to Visual FoxPro. I changed FoxPro to a disambig page and Foxpro to redirect to FoxPro. That done, the best article title I could think of was FoxPro 2 (for the 2.x tree that ended with 2.6). Any suggestions? --Bill W. Smith, Jr. 11:47, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

I know this article needs alot of work, including a code example or 2. I do all my work in FPU 2.6, and don't even have a copy of FPW anymore. If any are still using FPW26, it would be nice if they lent a hand. Bill W. Smith, Jr. 13:34, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

A section discussing the popularity of FoxPro, the environment where it grew to prominence and the reasons for its success would be enlightening. --Bsmith94 20:17, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] FoxPro on Solaris?

Did FoxPro 2.6 run on Solaris or SunOS?

Not to the best of my knowledge. BUT... if ibcs2 will run on Solaris then it SHOULD be possible. --Bill W. Smith, Jr. (talk/contribs) 21:16, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RDBMS?

"Relational" has nothing to do with "relations between tables"! It is a term in relational algebra, which is a basic for all RDBMS resesarch. "Relation" or "tuple" stands for what is usually called a row.