Fourier inversion theorem
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In mathematics and electrical engineering, Fourier inversion recovers a function from its Fourier transform. Several different Fourier inversion theorems exist.
Sometimes the following identity is used as the definition of the Fourier transform:
Then it is asserted that
In this way, one recovers a function from its Fourier transform.
However, this way of stating a Fourier inversion theorem sweeps some more subtle issues under the carpet. One Fourier inversion theorem assumes that f is Lebesgue-integrable, i.e., the integral of its absolute value is finite:
In that case, the Fourier transform is not necessarily Lebesgue-integrable; it may be only "conditionally integrable". For example, the function f(x) = 1 if −a < x < a and f(x) = 0 otherwise has Fourier transform
- 2sin(at) / t.
In such a case, the integral in the Fourier inversion theorem above must be taken to be an improper integral (Cauchy principal value)
rather than a Lebesgue integral.
By contrast, if we take f to be a tempered distribution -- a sort of generalized function -- then its Fourier transform is a function of the same sort: another tempered distribution; and the Fourier inversion formula is more simply proved.
[edit] Fourier transforms of quadratically integrable functions
Via the Plancherel theorem, one can also define the Fourier transform of a quadratically integrable function, i.e., one satisfying
Then the Fourier transform is another quadratically integrable function.
In case f is a quadratically integrable periodic function on the interval then it has a Fourier series whose coefficients are
The Fourier inversion theorem might then say that
What kind of convergence is right? "Convergence in mean square" can be proved fairly easily:
What about convergence almost everywhere? That would say that if f is quadratically integrable, then for "almost every" value of x between 0 and 2π we have
This was not proved until 1966 in (Carleson, 1966).
For strictly finitary discrete Fourier transforms, these delicate questions of convergence are avoided.
[edit] References
- Lennart Carleson (1966). On the convergence and growth of partial sums of Fourier series. Acta Math. 116, 135–157.