Four Hour Emergency Target
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is orphaned as few or no other articles link to it. Please help introduce links in articles on related topics. (May 2008) |
The Four Hour Emergency Target was introduced by the Department of Health for NHS acute hospitals in England. Setting a target that, by 2004, at least 98% of patients attending an A&E department must be seen, treated, admitted or discharged in under four hours.
Contents |
[edit] Objective
The UK Labour government had identified a requirement to promote improvements in A&E departments, which had suffered underfunding for a number of years. The target, accompanied by extra financial support, was a key plank to achieve the improvements.
[edit] Results
Tony Blair felt the targets had been successful in achieving their aim. "We feel, and maybe we are wrong, that one way we've managed to do that promote improvements in A&E is by setting a clear target"[1].
Forty-eight per cent of departments said they did not meet the target for the period ending 31 December 2004 [2]. Government figures show that in 2005-06, 98.2% of patients were seen, diagnosed and treated within four hours of their arrival at A&E, the first full financial year in which this has happened [3].
[edit] Missing the target
According to the BMA[4] the main reasons for not reaching this target are:
- Not enough inpatient beds
- Delayed discharges
- Delay in accessing specialist opinion
- Not enough nurses
- Not enough middle grade doctors
- Department too small
- Delay in accessing [diagnostic services]
[edit] Exceptions
The original target was set at 100%, but lowered to reflect clinical concerns that there will always be patients who need to spend slightly longer in A&E, under observation[5].
[edit] Pressure
Even though exceptions are allowed to the targets, concerns have been raised that the target has put pressure on A&E staff to compromise patient care.3 A significant proportion (90%) of A&E consultants welcomed the 4 hour target in a staudy but felt that 98% was too high a target [6].
[edit] References
- ^ http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4339653.stm
- ^ http://www.bma.org.uk/ap.nsf/Content/AandEwaiting
- ^ http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6267897.stm
- ^ http://www.bma.org.uk/ap.nsf/Content/AandEwaiting
- ^ http://www.oxford.gov.uk/files/meetingdocs/27833/item%207.pdf
- ^ http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4339653.stm