Talk:Foster Report

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Foster Report article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

The Arbitration Committee has placed all Scientology-related articles on probation (see relevant arbitration case). Editors making disruptive edits may be banned by an administrator from this and related articles, or other reasonably related pages.

	Scientology Portal This article is supported by WikiProject Scientology, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scientology. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on Scientology-related topics. See WikiProject Scientology and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

[edit] Citations

This page has zero citations except for one person's personal webpage. How do we know if this is reliable? 195.137.85.173 21:43, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Original Research?

I've queried the statement that the attention given to the Church of Scientology in the early sixties was a result of the controversies over its teachings, policies and activities. This is someone's inference and needs to be justified by a reference; were there any other reasons for the attention? And the Foster, Anderson, Lee and Dumbleton-Powles inquiries were clearly not simultaneous - as evidenced by the dates of their respective reports. DavidCooke 02:09, 2 January 2007 (UTC)