Talk:Fort Battleford

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fort Battleford article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: Associated task forces (general topics): Fortifications task force Associated task forces (nations and regions): Canadian military history task force

	Canada Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada and related WikiProjects, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Canada-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project member page, to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	Saskatchewan Portal This article is part of the Saskatchewan WikiProject (Discuss/Join).

Does "it also offered an alterative means of tranportation to the Red River Cart" mean that using the river was an option to hauling things via a Red River Ox Cart? If so, you might want to clarify that in the sentence and we can link to Red River Cart. --Habap 13:57, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Ah, okay. I'm still in the process of adding stuff to the article - mostly historical stuff. Hrm - information on the fort as it is now (National Historic Site, right) should be addressed - but before or after the history? --204.83.179.218 00:15, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC) I'm afraid I don't have the time to contribute anything more to this article; suggest it be fast-tracked. --Kelvin Palm 04:11, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Infobox

There is a choice between using Infobox Military Structure and Template:Infobox Protected area Kind Regards SriMesh | talk 04:42, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

Article reassessed and graded as stub