From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
The article on Forsmark Nuclear Power Plant is supported by WikiProject Sweden, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page; if you have any questions about the project or the article ratings below, please consult the FAQ. |
Start |
This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. |
Mid |
This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale. |
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, which collaborates on articles related to energy. |
Start |
This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. |
Low |
This article is on a subject of low importance within energy. |
This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
|
[edit] Critisism after the "July 2006 incident"
Can someone write about the great amounts of criticism; drunken staff (that was not allowed into the plant however) et.c, that has surfaced the latest weeks (in Sweden, at least). The full internal (confidential, before it leaked to the press) report from the power plant is available from Sveriges Television here (in Swedish). It shows quite a different picture than previous official statements did. This one is full of self-criticism, for example (freely translated) "any immediate improvements can not be seen directly after the transient [incident], even though that should have been the natural course of action". Kricke 22:16, 1 February 2007 (UTC)