Talk:Forrest Gump (character)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

↓    Skip to table of contents    ↓

	Film Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the priority scale.
Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film. Article upgrading needed: You can help! WP:IA   Stub to Start-Class Upgrading Instructions for Films Note that instructions for articles on other types of film topics within the scope of WikiProject Films are currently under development. To contribute in upgrading this stub article to Start class, the following requirements must be met: Significant intro (list the title, alternate titles, year released, director, actors starring in the film, summary of headings, etc.) Film infobox ({{infobox film}}) Picture: Consult WikiProject Free Images for freely released images from a film shoot, opening, or other relevant free image. Non-free and unlicensed images are to be avoided if at all possible, but if used should include a detailed fair use rationale. (An image is not required for start class if unavailable.) Plot summary Include cast and crew information. At least two other developed sections of information (production, reception (including box office figures), awards and honors, themes, differences from novel or TV show, soundtrack, sequels, DVD release, etc.) Categories (by year, country, language, and genre(s))  Helpful links: WP:BETTER, WP:LEAD, WP:REF, WP:WAF Once this article has fulfilled these requirements, the film can be reassessed to Start class and this template will be removed automatically.
Additional Information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no

	Literature Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

	This article is part of WikiProject Alabama, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Alabama on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.

Contents 1 Questions 2 Fair use rationale for Image:ForrestGump2.jpg 3 Broken Apart

[edit] Questions

Why is he listed under "Fictional United States Democrats"? Is he established as a Democrat in the novel?

Shouldn't the movie synopsis be under the movie Forrest Gump? --Stoic Squirrel 07:43, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Shouldn't some mention be made of his running around America? That took up a good portion of the film and one could say is part of his character.

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:ForrestGump2.jpg

Image:ForrestGump2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:11, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Broken Apart

I believe this article should be broken into two articles

1. Forest Gump the novelization character

2. Forest Gump the movie character

the characters are significantly different could someone do this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Benadamspears (talk • contribs) 04:32, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

No, its one character. The article should focus on the novel character, with a section discussion changes in his movie appearance. Collectonian (talk) 04:46, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Collectionian, I'm not sure about your rationale. Arguably, the film is more famous than the novel - indeed, the amount of data on the Wiki concerning the novel is negligible, while the film has a full and well developed article. The original author of the book also considered the two extremely different, to the extent of disliking the change - if we are attempting to give primacy to the origin of the character, should we not then respect the authors wisheds and split the two? Scanna (talk) 23:37, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Addendum: I wouldn't support it as two articles, though. One article with two sections, sure. Indeed, to me that's the only sensible way of doing it, it's merely a question of how we divide him up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scanna (talk • contribs) 23:38, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

The novel character came first. Per everything I've read dealing with such issues (which comes up quite a bit in the anime/manga articles I work on), as the novel character is first and the origin (i.e. the true character), it is the one the article should focus on. The intro and first part of the article should focus on the book character. Then, a second section, discussion the film presentation/adaptation of that character. Collectonian (talk) 23:54, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

The article should not exist in the first place, read WP: FICT, it's basically a list of differences between the novel character and the film character that can easily be covered in the main film article. I suggest a merge.--The Dominator (talk) 04:59, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

The decision was made to keep it separate in earlier discussion because the character of Forrest Gump has plenty of real-world notability. Unfortunately, the article is in hideous shape after all of the splits and clean out of the plot and no one seeming to be willing to take the time to expand it like it needs. Collectonian (talk) 05:06, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

I would help, but I've never read the book or its sequel, so there is very little I can do at the moment.--The Dominator (talk) 16:31, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

To weigh in, I don't think that the character from either the novel or the film deserves precedent. While the character does originate from the novel, due weight should be given to both incarnations, such as how they were intended to be portrayed and how they were received. I think that's the most objective approach, since we can't really argue about the level of content for each incarnation. For all we know, the prominence of the film may have obscure coverage about the novel and its protagonist. Or not. Best way to find out is to make an effort to seek out references in novel-related and film-related resources. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 16:55, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Another approach to consider is if it is appropriate to have a character article at all. Considering that the books and the film are essentially about the character, these individual articles should be able to adequately address the portrayal of the primary character. Let's hypothesize that the articles for the books and the film are Featured Articles; they would likely contain detail about the character and how he has been received in each incarnation. Creating a character article after all this would likely repeat the information shared in a disjointed form. It may depend on if there are references that cover the character in all incarnations, rather than us finding separate references and placing them side by side. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 17:03, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

I think that in this case the character article should stay (Major cleanup and probably a rewrite required). It is a well known character that appeared in two books and a film, but certainly not a separate article for the film and novel character, it's the same character!--The Dominator (talk) 17:36, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

No, it's actually not the same character. The movie character is a major re-interpretation, not a re-make and therefore none of them should be favoured. --TheShady (talk) 21:25, 28 February 2008 (GMT+1)