Talk:Form
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
What is going to be at form? Hyacinth 19:05, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Hmm... this is the first time I've done this. I was thinking that nothing would be at the former Form page, but maybe we should put what I called Form (shape) back at Form, as it is the longest and probably most general article. I still have several links to that page to fix. What do you think? Lesgles 22:10, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
-
- I remember something pertinent on either Wikipedia:Redirect or Wikipedia:Disambiguation. It seems like we should be using "form" for an article to be consistent with, for instance, Rome and Rome (disambiguation). Hyacinth 22:28, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
[edit] "Class" or "grade", too?
Doesn't it also mean class or grade? If so, a line should be added about this meaning, with a link to either or both articles. Adam78 01:04, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Literture and art? Formalism without Form?
I've been searching about for more information regarding the literture or artistic meanings of form, and I was disappointed to see them lacking. I mean take a look at this here: Form
Also I noted that Scott McCloud's dissertation in Understanding Comics is not linked to this, as form is one of the major points in his book, it is a good source for linking together various related concepts on this subject.
(KickAssClown 22:12, 3 November 2006 (UTC))