Talk:Foreign relations of Tibet

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

ཛ

This article is about a person, place, or concept whose name is originally rendered in the Tibetan script; however the article does not have that version of its name in the article's lead paragraph. Anyone who is knowledgeable enough with the original language is invited to assist in adding the Tibetan script.

[edit] Ran, the Troll of Tibet Related Articles

do not feed the troll Ran. He is a pro communist china vandal and nationalist. Me 04:27, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Ran, what is your problem? Why are you reverting all my edits? Explain yourself. Stop trolling me. Me 17:38, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Why do you have the han's picture on the article on Tibet? Put some Tibetan picture. Me 17:41, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Article need cleaning up

This article needs some cleaning up. Certain parts read like opinion or story telling and not up to the standard of factual history

"In early 1943 Tolstoy continued into China arriving at Lanzhou in June, 1943. The Tibetans were a neutral nation during the war, while China was not. This tends to show that Tibet was autonomous at that time."

Is this Tolstoy opinion, an entry of his journal or the contributor’s own opinion?

"...Tibetan passports, and, again, a US officer in Hong Kong, thus defeating the efforts of the US State Department and the British Foreign Office to deny use of the Tibetan passports, a small victory for the supposedly unsophisticated Tibetans"

Who claim the Tibetans are unsophisticated? (WannabeAmatureHistorian 20:56, 9 November 2007 (UTC))