Talk:Forbes Global 2000

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Something wrong

It's something wrong with the sort-function. It thinks that 55 is a lot bigger than 350. Maybe it is sorting it in alphabetic order? Grrahnbahr 20:31, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

It was an error in decimal point formatting. Fixed now (i hope). --Jklamo 02:21, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Royal Dutch Shell

If you disagree with Royal Dutch Shell HQ setting, please discuss that on Royal Dutch Shell article discussion page, not in this artile. You are not correcting error, it is disputable issue and this artilce is not place to solve that issue. Also note that this list is Forbes based list and Forbes is constatnly using Netherlands. --Jklamo (talk) 00:07, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

My edit had nothing to do with the HQ, my edit was on the 2006 list. Look at the Shell site, if you read it you will see that the origins are both UK and Dutch, HQ in the Netherlands but stock listed in London and the registered Office in London as well. That is clear so i can't see why you are so adament it is not UK/Dutch. Whats Forbes says is irrelevent, would you transfer a sources inaccuracy to wikipedia, I think not. On another note, I see no reason why this should not be discussed here, there is no conflict in the Shell article so why should it be discussed there. The conflict is on this page 22:34, 28 January 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.9.137.92 (talk)