User talk:Fonzie Fan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Look, The Sandbox is used by Wikipedians for page testing. I wanted to test out my template on there. I do not appreciate being called a "nerd" for clearing the page to do my test. I do not want you to do this again. Zscout370 01:13, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Your very own sandbox!

Please create your own sandbox at User:Fonzie Fan/Sandbox and test whatever you like there. Many people think that putting in Fonzie's image all the time is annoying. Thanks. -- Stevey7788 03:49, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Not everyone feels the same way; I feel the sandbox is for whatever you want, and if someone wants an area where they can safely test out templates, they can do it in their own user space. --SPUI (talk) 23:37, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • SPUI, I think what me and Stevey talked about is that this user keeps on putting the "Fonzerelli Code" into the Sandbox. Granted, it is tamer than what it used to be, but this user is almost trying to make the Sandbox his own. We can discuss this more at length on my talk page, if you wish, SPUI. Zscout370 01:52, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] IP/insult

Wait a minute, why are you using this anon IP to insult yourself? — Stevey7788 (talk) 05:29, 3 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] User page

  • I am shocked that you have not yet created a user page with a picture of Fonzie on it... Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:37, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
You're back placing junk in the sandbox AGAIN? — Stevey7788 (talk) 06:27, 9 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Come on

Come on, it's just for fun! I actually like you, you know. Don't take it seriously. Let's play in the Sandbox together! Fonzie Fan SUCKS 21:53, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you...

for at least being a harmless vandal.

Regards, lots of issues | leave me a message 00:09, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Satanic churches are not funny

Hello Fonzie Fan, please feel free to play around in the sandbox. Something like your former account McDonoaldsisHiring,ApplyToday! is quite fun. BUT, TheDemonicDisciplesOfDebuque and TheSatanicChorusOfChicago are NOT FUNNY AT ALL. They could be religiously insulting to many. Please avoid joking around with religion, homosexuality, race, and other issues which have recently stirred up much controversy. Play around like DrZoidberg, but don't joke around with controversial issues. Satanic churches are not funny at all. Thank you for your cooperation. — Stevey7788 (talk) 21:45, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I bet Fonzie is Satanic --Fonzie Enemy 01:12, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Fonzie Enemy

To whom it may concern:

Fonzie Enemy is not my sockpuppet!

[edit] Since April 12

Wow...you've been "communicating" in the sandbox since April 12, Fonzie Fan. May I ask what it is all about? func(talk) 3 July 2005 21:17 (UTC)

OK. :) I wasn't threatening to block you, and I don't have that ability anyway. I was just curious. Thank you for responding. Cheers, func(talk) 4 July 2005 03:38 (UTC)

[edit] Fonzie Fan????

Wow, Fonzie! Keep on pasting these things in the sandbox! -- Righteous Monkey 6 July 2005 01:06 (UTC)

[edit] Raindeer

Fonzie is not human, he's a reindeer! I mean RAINdeer! (OK, it's a joke.) Fonzie the Red-nosed Raindeer 6 July 2005 01:24 (UTC)

I am not Zoidberg. I'm Jimbo Wales' sockpuppet. Fonzie the Red-nosed Raindeer 6 July 2005 01:28 (UTC)
Are you Angela's socky then? Fonzie the Red-nosed Raindeer 6 July 2005 01:29 (UTC)

[edit] Warning

I must warn you to stop being disruptive on the sandbox. The sandbox is not your own personal playpen; please refrain from continuing to disrupt Wikipedia. Thank you. Linuxbeak | Talk | Desk July 6, 2005 02:01 (UTC)

Control yourself, dude. You're getting ridiculous now. Linuxbeak | Talk | Desk July 6, 2005 02:09 (UTC)

There ya go. No problems, no worries. I'm not saying to not have fun, but I'm just saying to keep it under 50 :-) Linuxbeak | Talk | Desk July 6, 2005 02:14 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires.User:Wikipedia Vandalism Warning Bot

This is a lie. Keep the Fonzie coming. --SPUI (talk) 16:21, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] DrZoidberg for admin!

DrZoidberg has been nominated for Administrator!! Please feel free to vote on this matter.  DrZoidberg 15:56, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] DrZoidberg has been blocked

Hello Fonzie Fan,

DrZoidberg has been blocked. See User talk:DrZoidberg You may want to carefully watch what you do now, or you may also be blocked in the future. — Stevey7788 (talk) 00:41, 29 July 2005 (UTC)

Just please don't dump in large amounts of text, annoy people, and crash servers as DrZoidberg does. Then you'll be fine. I do hope you'll have a nice time hanging around the sandbox though. Thanks. — Stevey7788 (talk) 19:29, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
Anyways, I have always been wondering who Fonzie is. Could you please tell me? — Stevey7788 (talk) 19:31, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
Hi Fonzie Fan. I would really like your opinion on User talk:DrZoidberg and discuss with him about article edits. — Stevey7788 (talk) 20:20, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
Hello again :) It's totally OK to play in the sandbox, and you can edit articles while playing fun in the sand. Hope you enjoy the new world of editing! — Stevey7788 (talk) 18:36, 14 August 2005 (UTC)

Hi, Fonzie Fan. Sorry for eavesdropping. It is OK for a user to have more than one account, although it does tend to be discourged. The important thing is that your multiple accounts are never used for deception, such as voting in a poll, etc. Please see Wikipedia:Sock puppet for more details. :) Func( t, c, e,  ) 19:38, 14 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] I am blocked (I think)

Hi, Fonzie Fan. In the above paragraph, when I was "eavesdropping", I was actually directly responding to a question you had asked over at Stevey7788's talk page:

I also note that [Dr. Zoidburg] only allowed to come back on the condition that he makes a serious contribution. Im thinking that its only a matter of time before that condition is demanded of Fonzie Fan. Because of that, I should probably make a contribution outside the sandbox. What I have in mind is filling in some gaps on some of the music articles.(The album track list is what I particually have in mind.) Ill make a few sample pages, and then Id like your opinion.
Also-would it be violating sockpuppet rules being Fonzie Fan only in the sandbox and another name on the other pages?

In other words, I thought you wanted to create a new account for serious contributions, and to leave "Fonzie Fan" for sandbox editing, and I thought that sounded like a good idea. What you actually did was create another account just for editing the sandbox. Fonzie Fan, I really feel that you are beginning to push at the limits of the community's tolarance for your sandbox activities, and so it isn't surprising that some members of the community are going to push back.

If Zscout370 specifically wanted to block you, (er, the "Fonzie Fan" account), then you would not have been able to edit my talk page, but I think you should consider trying to make serious contributions to the project. I also think that you should definitely not create any more user accounts at this point, as some are seeing them as disruptive.

Basically, I personally don't see you as being disruptive, in fact, I have noticed you replacing the template-text and keeping the sandbox clear of profanity, and that is very much appreciated, but I really can't "go to bat" for you with other admins when you haven't shown substantial attempts to help us write our encyclopedia.

You might want to talk directly to Zscout370 about this on his talk page, (as "Fonzie Fan"). He is a really nice guy who is just looking out for Wikipedia's best interests.

Func( t, c, @, ) 01:22, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use

Please stop adding fair use pictures of fonzie to pages not directly related to happy days. The picture can only be used under fair use, which its use in articles not about happy days isn't. --fvw* 02:08, 4 October 2005 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fonzie.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fonzie.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC)