From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
|
Editing Guidelines |
Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article:
- If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film)
- When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references.
- Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.
|
|
|
|
[edit] Johannes Duncker as a source
Is Johannes Duncker okay as a reliable source? christophernolan.net is obviously a fan site, but it looks classy. I checked other Nolan film articles and none use Duncker as a source, so I question whether we should here. Thoughts?
Jim Dunning | talk 15:46, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Eh, you're probably right. I think I was being a bit hasty with my sources there. But it's information that shouldn't be too hard to source from somewhere else. On a related note, what's the consensus regarding the use of DVD commentaries as a source? Because Nolan's commentary on Following is a goldmine.JMalky (talk) 15:56, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- They are fair game. Use {{Cite video}} for the ref formatting.
Jim Dunning | talk 16:03, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Good because it looks like we'll have to draw on it heavily! There seems to be very little on the web about Following, and even less that definitely satisfies WP:RS. JMalky (talk) 19:59, 19 May 2008 (UTC)