Talk:Flyglobespan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.	Aviation Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated projects or task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- B-Class-1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- B-Class-2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- B-Class-3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- B-Class-4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- B-Class-5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Airlines WikiProject

Contents 1 Fleet list 2 Flights to London 3 Reliability 4 Flights to South Arica (Cape Town) 5 Fair use rationale for Image:Flyglobespanlogo.jpg 6 Negative Reading

[edit] Fleet list

Globespan operate at least one 767 to Sanford? - the fleet list shows only 737s the link at planespotters.net is out of date I'm afraid? --Sammason 16:02, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Fixed

Adamcobb 08:59, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Flights to London

Flyglobespan didn't start flights to London Stansted as long ago as May 2004 did it? Kennethmac2000

No, it didn't! Typo, should be May 2005.--Ayrshire--77 4 July 2005 07:58 (UTC)

Correcting the typo has spoilt the chronological flow of this article though. It discusses May 2005 and then appears to jump back to March 2005. Kennethmac2000 4 July 2005 14:23 (UTC)

Sorted. Just swapped the paragraphs around a little and now should be in the order of March 05, May 05 and future. --Ayrshire--77 4 July 2005 17:25 (UTC)

[edit] Reliability

User: Stardub (who doesn't understand the comment signing syntax) - Is it forbidden to insert customer reports? It's amazing how bad the recent reports for this airline are. Doesn't it qualify for a general issue for this airline? I remember with Air Madrid on Wikipedia it was allowed to report about the rapid descending quality once the airline headed into trouble with delays >24 hours. It is the same with Flyglobespan right now if you verify with airlinequality dott com (and i'm tired of these output errors i'm getting from wikipedia)

Customer Opinion websites are not considered encyclopedic content, as per WikiProject Airlines page guidelines under external links: "Do not include un-encyclopedic opinion web sites" (see WikiProject_Airlines) 82.44.26.36 16:54, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

BBC TV Watchdog programme did a report on poor service from the company on 7th November 2007 BBC Watchdog --jmb 23:21, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Flights to South Arica (Cape Town)

(27 Sept. 2007) Relatives, who live in the UK and had booked to fly with Globespan for a holiday in February 2008, have been informed that Globespan have ceased flights to SA due to "Uncooperation from SA government" and have been refunded for their booking. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RacingRog (talk • contribs) 05:26, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Flyglobespanlogo.jpg

Image:Flyglobespanlogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 13:20, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Negative Reading

I feel that this article reads in a negative way. Tjnewell

If you feel anything is factually wrong then please be WP:BOLD and change it. If you have any particular points then please detail them on this page and they can be discussed. Please sign your posts with four tildes. MilborneOne (talk) 19:28, 18 December 2007 (UTC)