Talk:Fluocinonide

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fluocinonide is part of WikiProject Pharmacology, a project to improve all Pharmacology-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other pharmacology articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale.

Chemicals WikiProject Fluocinonide is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.
Chemistry WikiProject This article is also supported by WikiProject Chemistry.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.


Contents

[edit] expiration

What is the typical time from manufacture to labelled expiration? (About 3 years?) As it ages, does it just get weak in intended action, or are other compounds formed -- what would they be, and what effects would they have? 69.87.200.179 10:56, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] veterinary uses

Is fluocinonide useful in non-humans? Dogs and cats? 69.87.200.179 10:56, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] common forms

Fluocinonide cream 0.05% for external use only; not for opthalmic use. About $US 13 (2006) for 30g, Rx only. Store at 20-25C. Expiration > two years. Taro Pharmaceuticals US/Canada.

[edit] alternatives

tea tree oil

[edit] storage temperature

What is the optimum long-term storage temperature? -69.87.204.151 22:25, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] strength

What is the "Glucocorticoid potency" of Lidex, compared to Hydrocortisone? -69.87.204.151 01:47, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 07:53, 10 November 2007 (UTC)