User talk:Flowerkiller1692

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Content removal

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Caitlin Bree (Clerks). Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Hmwith 03:34, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Flowerkiller1692! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! -- Kukini 23:46, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical

[edit] Edit Summary Request

I have noted that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky or even vandalizing. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! -- Kukini 23:46, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:PeterLaFleur.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:PeterLaFleur.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:07, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Michael bluth.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Michael bluth.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jackofalltradesmasterofnone 12:27, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Survivor 16 (2nd nomination)

Please see my comment here. --TeckWiz is now R ParlateContribs@ (Let's go Yankees!) 11:29, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jackass

You appear to be adding unsourced biographical material about Jackass. Any chance you could find sources to verifiy your edits? Thanks, Deiz talk 00:01, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Supercouple article

Your addition of Gaius Baltar and Number Six to the Primetime supercouples section of the Supercouple article was/is a good addition, of course. I changed their years of reign from 2003 to 2008 to rather 2003 to present, because it's not 2008 yet at this time. If it's 2008 in their time already, we're going by real-life time. You also had the title of the source wrong, but I fixed that. Anyway, I'll see you around. Flyer22 08:30, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

I replied here, of course. Thanks for explaining. Flyer22 08:44, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AverageJoes.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AverageJoes.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:20, 27 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AndyTaylorDangerous.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AndyTaylorDangerous.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 12:46, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PeterandWhite.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:PeterandWhite.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:01, 26 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:WhiteandKate.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:WhiteandKate.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:54, 30 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Flash sm.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Flash sm.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] TfD nomination of Template:Sandler

Template:Sandler has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Wildhartlivie (talk) 18:18, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] List of Supercouples

Your edits of sorting by year have been reverted. The list is in alphabetical order which is more appropriate than year. People who don't know year of reign certainly know spelling and alpha order. KellyAna (talk) 01:36, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Kevin Durant

His ROY award has not been officially announced by the NBA or the Sonics. Thus, we can't include details of his (expected) win per WP:CRYSTAL. --Madchester (talk) 23:44, 30 April 2008 (UTC)