User talk:FloridaFox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, FloridaFox, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Just H 20:06, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] My Appologies

I was unaware of the fact that Winters is deceased. I shall not revert your edit assuming that you will provide a reference tomorrow from a local newspaper or other reliable source. Rafiqr 04:11, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Historical not history

I'm sorry, I read the word out of context. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BaRiMzI (talk • contribs) 02:36, 23 April 2007 (UTC).



[edit] May 2007

For the record, none of my entries were vandalism but quite accurate additions. The editor, moving about rather swiftly in order to stop genuine vandalism, simply adjudged my accurate entries as vandalism in order to move on. Wikipedia encourages people to add to incomplete lists. I am very sorry that TREYwiki misidentified my entries as vandalism but I shall no longer participate in this web site for fear further contributions will likewise be deemed vadalism and I shall be banned from the site.

FloridaFox


Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed maintenance notices from CBS News, even though required changes haven't been made. If you are uncertain whether the page requires further work, or if you disagree with the notice, please discuss these issues on the page's talk page before removing the notice from the page. These notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of a page. Thank you. --TREYWiki 23:34, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tony Zappone

Where are the references and sources in this article on Tony Zappone? There aren't any. --K72ndst 21:31, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

But none of the references are in the article, how come? This isn't Wiki policy. I appreciate all the links you put onto my user page (should be on the Discussion page, like all others....) but the article really does not conform to Wiki policy for a living person. Listing phone numbers of sources? Why? --K72ndst 21:28, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Just as soon as I have sufficient time I will work them in as well as I can without muddying up the article. The bio you put up about yourself, Kevin C. Fitzpatrick, has unsourced and undocumented information but remains an excellent read. I enjoyed it without it being mired in references.

I provided names and phone numbers of sources in my message to you for the convenience of anyone who wished to challenge the legitimacy of what was written. These sources are not secret and are accessible.

I hope you go after those bios and articles which are a lot worse and those who write falsehoods on this site with as much passion and zeal as you have shown here. Meanwhile, if you care to simply delete the article I have no objections to that. This site can be exhausting for legitimate writers and a piece of cake for frauds, meaning no disrespect to you. Just a candid observation. FloridaFox 00:08, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] One Breath at a Time, Inc.

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to One Breath at a Time, Inc.. See Wikipedia:Copyrights. Copyright violations are unacceptable and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Your original contributions are welcome. Gamaliel (Orwellian Cyber hell master) 17:28, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Notability of One Breath at a Time, Inc.

A tag has been placed on One Breath at a Time, Inc., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  superβεεcat  01:06, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Heya, you have to understand that every article up here has to meet notability standards, that is, carefully read WP:N. That includes red cross, microsoft, and everyone else. That article had not a single citation of a reliable secondary source. Moreover, licenses that purport to give a free license to wikipedia, are not fair game to make wikipedia articles from, wikipedia articles are created using sourced material, not first hand research or reposts of public-domain articles. - superβεεcat 01:26, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of One Breath at a Time, Inc.

An editor has nominated One Breath at a Time, Inc., an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Breath at a Time, Inc. and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 02:29, 22 January 2008 (UTC)