The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The result was: Merge as proposed. --B. Wolterding (talk) 13:43, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
I propose to merge the content of Control valve cavitation into here, since the notability of that article has been questioned. Actually I am not sure where to put that piece of information, but I think it would bet fit into the "Flow control valve" article.
In my opinion, the Control valve cavitation article definitely does not merit being a stand-alone article. It should either be deleted completely or merged into Flow control valve as proposed. - mbeychok 17:43, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
A merge sounds fine to me.--Hooperbloob 16:27, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.