User talk:Flickts

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Flickts, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Rkitko (talk) 13:00, 15 September 2007 (UTC)


Contents

[edit] Welcome to WikiProject Plants!

[edit] Bizarre articles

Hi Flickts. Articles such as Spanish Vocab and Shakespeare 101 are non-encyclopedic and we don't want them. Thanks for your efforts though! There's a welcome message at the top of this page with links you might like to read about the type of articles we need in our encyclopedia. Thanks. ➔ This is REDVEЯS 19:12, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Welcom to Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools

I would like to welcome you to the group. we can always use more active participants and you seem to be enthusiastic. I would, however, like to ask you to please review the assessment guidelines before you assess any more articles. Some of your assessments have been unwarrantedly high and have been reverted to their previous state. Please let me know if you have any questions concerning our assessment process and happy editing! Adam McCormick 20:58, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Biography Newsletter 5

To receive this newsletter in the future, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 15:34, 7 October 2007 (UTC) .


[edit] List of Pink Floyd bootlegs

A tag has been placed on List of Pink Floyd bootlegs, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Arx Fortis (talk) 15:47, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Empty pages: solutions

It's much better to create an article with enough content already in place (at least enough material to be a stub). You can also create a subpage (see WP:SUBPAGE) and work on the article there until you are ready to 'go live', at which time you move the article to the mainspace. By the way, Please make sure the article cites to reliable sources which verify its content, or it will be deleted in any case. Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:07, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pink Floyd bootleg page

In reply to your post on my talk page, the bootleg article was deleted primarily for one reason: The article contained little to no content and was marked for deletion under the Criteria for Speedy Deletion - No Content (WP:CSD#A3). When building articles, a page should start with enough content to merit its inclusion. Things like notability (WP:N) and citation (WP:CITE) of reliable, verifiable, third-party sources (WP:RS, WP:V) should be included.
However, the nature of the page is "bootlegs." Bootlegs are, inherently, illegal. Thus, I'm not sure if the article would meet the notability guidelines unless there was a reason for it's notability besides the fact that it's a bootleg. That, however, would be for someone else to comment on as I am not very well versed in Wikipedia's legal issues. ++Arx Fortis (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Old Man and the Sea/Context

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Old Man and the Sea/Context, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/oldman/context.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:58, 16 February 2008 (UTC)