Talk:Flight of the Navigator

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Norway, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Norway. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
???
This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.

Some discussion on the special effects here would be nice. At the time, I thought the ship's mirroring and transforming effects were phenominal. -- Sy / (talk) 14:12, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Special Effects

Added mention of liquid metal properties of the ship. -- Hydrargyrum

Did you only say that because your username means "Mercury"? ;) -- Denelson83 22:57, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] DVD had no special features.

I remember seeing the featurette on the Disney Channel, but it's not on the DVD. -- Eddie 08:01, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Akai 5900 Digital Sampler ? Not really...

In the end credits of the movie they mentioned an "Akai 5900" Digital Sampler. IMHO there is no Akai 5900. It should read "Akai S900", one of Akai's most popular MIDI-Samplers that came out in 1986. See [1] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.79.139.139 (talk) 06:08, 12 December 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Introduction

I just wanted to leave a note saying that I know I made an already too short introduction shorter, but the words I removed didn't add meaning. By way of justification: "transported in time eight years into the future" is tautology, and there's no need to say "somehow" if you're then going to explain how it happened. Perhaps an explanation of the title could be used to pad the introduction - it actually includes no mention of flying or navigating. I haven't seen this film in ages so I can't recall details well enough to add them. 212.248.180.200 (talk) 15:14, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

    • The explanation was very confusing. As it was explained in the film, and according to laws of physics, it would involve Eistein's Theory of relativity. He traveled faster than the speed of light and (also mentioned in the film) time "slows down" when you approach the speed of light. He was only "gone" a few hours, but since his travel was at that speed, the people back on earth observed 8 years gone by. Doctorindy (talk) 01:12, 24 March 2008 (UTC)