Talk:Fleischer Studios

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
B
This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
???
This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.
Animation This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.
B This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject American Animation. (rated as Top importance)

[edit] Public domain

How can I find out if a Betty Boop/ Fleischer B/W cartoon is Public Domain? 惑乱 分からん 13:47, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Popeye

The article states that the Popeye cartoons did not become public domain, but right alongside it is a picture of a Popeye cartoon with a caption saying it's public domain. The text also indicated that cartoons such as Popeye the Sailor Meets Sindbad the Sailor are owned by a.a.p., but the page for that cartoon says that it is public domain. Did some of these cartoons become public domain after the time period it's discussing, and the article just failed to mention it, or is there some confusion here? - furrykef (Talk at me) 23:53, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Paramount bankruptcy

I originally removed the mention of Paramount bankruptcy because I had not heard of it before and no reference was cited. It was added again, this time with a reference. OK, I believe you, but what is the point of mentioning it here? What impact did it have on the Fleischers?

I also removed it because it was placed as an interruption between two related sentences.

I'm not trying to be a jerk. Please show me how the brief bankruptcy and reorganization of Paramount is relevant here. Make it pertinent, and it'll stay. --Bigscarymike 16:13, 19 June 2007 (UTC)