User talk:Flcelloguy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notice Thank you for your patience; I recently had an unexpected period of busyness. I should be back to active editing soon.
Welcome to my talk page! Feel free to leave comments, questions, or suggestions. Please place all messages on the bottom, using the new section header ( ==HEADER NAME== ). I will respond on your user talk page. Some responses may take some time if I get sidetracked; thank you for your patience. This page will be archived periodically.

Archives:


Contents

[edit] RFA Thanks

I would like to thank you for your support in my recent RFA. As you may or may not be aware, it passed with approximately 99% support. I ensure you that I will use the tools well, and if I ever disappoint you, I am open to recall. If you ever need anything, don't hesitate to leave me a note on my talkpage. Thanks again, ^demon[omg plz] 20:39, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Featured article review of Supreme Court of the United States

Supreme Court of the United States has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:56, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Checkuser

I added my name to the checkuser requests list. I understand that you are opposed to the process being done this way and I must say, I'm not sure this is a good approach. That said, I'm not sure what would be a good approach, assuming more checkusers are required. Perhaps admins requesting checkusers frequently, though most cases of sockpuppetry can be resolved without RFCUs. --Yamla 04:13, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Answer

I have emailed you with an answer to your question. Danny 02:12, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

I have responded to you. Danny 19:18, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Civility

I was impressed by the civility I've seen in your comments and discussions, and just wanted to leave a note of appreciation. Comments like yours, such as at the RfA talk pages, keep me (and probably a lot of other users, as well) from getting too discouraged over not-so-civil comments. Thanks again. *Vendetta* (whois talk edits) 19:24, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: School of the Art Institute of Chicago

Hi, thanks for helping out a couple of months ago with splitting the article into 2 sections, but I just noticed that Art Institute of Chicago and School of the Art Institute of Chicago share the same talk pages. Can they be separated or is this how it should be to retain the history of discussion? --SquatGoblin 08:14, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Photograph Dispute on the B-36 Article Page

This particular issue goes awhile back. I've done the suggested advice and let the situation cool down before I attempt to resolve this situation.

This is the problem, the user Rogerd has been trying to put his personal photograph on the B-36 article. He does not hide the fact that he took it since it is featured on his personal photograph gallery http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rogerd/photo_gallery

I feel very strongly that he is bias towards his photograph versus the official U.S. Air Force photograph taken of the same aircraft, which in my opinion, is of better quality and is not crooked. In addition, this photograph does not show any museum spectators and does not obsecure the aircraft from view and shows more of the aircraft http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:060315-F-1234P-001.jpg

I feel that I was unfairly overwhelmed by his inner circle of users on Wiki and the dispute is still unresolved in my opinion.

-Signaleer 18:46, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] You helped choose Ludwig van Beethoven as this week's WP:ACID winner

 Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Ludwig van Beethoven was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.

— Pious7TalkContribs 10:31, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Xiangqi FAR

Xiangqi has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. LuciferMorgan 15:05, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Photograph Dispute?

What is this in reference to? -Signaleer 06:55, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Yes, by all means--I would like to have a consensus of the photograph. -Signaleer 06:33, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Template:ArbCom candidate

Hi Flcelloguy. You created {{ArbCom candidate}} for the January 2006 Arbcom elections and said you would delete it when those elections were over. The format the candidate stats are listed in doesn't seem to have been used in the most recent election, so is there any more use, or would you like to delete it now? Picaroon (Talk) 23:00, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Better source request for Image:Gavel.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gavel.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talkpage. Thank you. MECU≈talk 15:37, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Simple Wiktionary

Thanks for your past work on SE Wikt. I've set a goal of 2,000 words by the end of the month and I'm hoping you'll help us reach it.--BrettR 17:10, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi Flcelloguy! Cromwellt here. I don't know if the Signpost mentions article milestones for sisterprojects, but if it does, please mention that Simple English Wiktionary reached 2,000 articles on 4 Aug 7. We'd love it if you became active over there again! --Cromwellt|talk|contribs 06:49, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Oversight

Hello. I am posting this message on your talk page, as you are identified as an individual with oversight permission on the English Wikipedia. On July 7, I sent a request for oversight to the appropriate email address. On July 8, that request was partially completed. Unfortunately, since that time, my (several) requests for follow-up have gone without reply. On July 18, I posted a message to the talk page for Oversight, which has not yet received a response. If you could please take a look at that message, and if you could please assist me with the remainder of the original request, I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you!   j    talk   20:52, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] We miss you

I hope you start editing again soon. Raul654 17:49, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Ditto. And even if something is preventing you from editing right now, I hope you will at least check in and assure us that everything is all right (which, of course, we hope it is). Newyorkbrad 02:28, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Same here. Ral315 » 01:19, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Garry Denke

You may not get this in time, but I noticed that you nominated this user's userpage for deletion in January. Further problems have now arisen and I'd very much appreciate your input at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Garry_Denke. Thanks. --Cherry blossom tree 11:35, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Millipore

Hello, on 5 March 2006 you deleted Millipore Corporation in a move to Millipore Corp. It was subsequently deleted as a copyvio. Consequently somebody then hijacked the Millipore disambig page instead. This is one of the largest companies in the world, a long-standing S&P 500 company. As part of the Wikipedia missing articles project, I intend to rewrite the article with refs as a stub, as Millipore Corporation, and to restore the disambig page.Steven Russell 18:38, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Help if possible?

Hi mate,

I am a Sysop on the Arrsepedia - a military themed Wiki. We have no in-built edit count or administrative ability. Can we use your tool on our Wiki? I have tried emailing you to no avail at your Hotmail address so please feel free to email me at 'arrsefaq@btinternet.com'. Cheers! 81.152.170.116 (talk) 15:12, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] ArbCom

Please see this WP:AE discussion regarding an ArbCom in which you sat on the committee: WP:AE#Darwinek and breach of standard civility parole. Please be reassured that I will answer and all questions, to clarify the question brought up of my character in the matter, something which I insist on in coming to proper closure of the matter. Charles 08:46, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Robert Lawson (architect)

Robert Lawson (architect) has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. SilkTork *SilkyTalk 09:27, 1 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Missing image Image:Arowanacele4.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Arowanacele4.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Arowanacele4.jpg is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Arowanacele4.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 03:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Possibly unfree Image:Gavel.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Gavel.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 03:42, 12 April 2008 (UTC) --Sdrtirs (talk) 03:42, 12 April 2008 (UTC)