User talk:FlagFreak
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] May 2008
Your recent edit to Google Street View (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. Please do not add email addresses/phone numbers, Imageshack/Photobucket/Flickr, or related links to non-talk pages if possible. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 22:49, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Cheetle
A tag has been placed on Cheetle, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Paxsimius (talk) 01:36, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed deletion of Meat/bun ratio problem
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Meat/bun ratio problem, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mattinbgn\talk 02:44, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, I will be improving the article in the next upcoming days. Sorry for any confusion. --FlagFreak TALK 02:51, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. You may wish to contribute an article like this to Uncyclopedia. This site isn't appropriate for something like this. Thank you. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:55, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- As a popular phenomenon, the meat/bun ratio problem is notable enough to have its own article. How is it inappropriate? If truly against WIkipedia policies, please remove it. Thank you. --FlagFreak TALK 03:02, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- Understand that something as far out as a "meat/bun ratio" needs to have proper sourcing to prove that it in fact is not a hoax. If you are willing to provide that, I will gladly restore the article. Tiptoety talk 03:09, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, you have my word. ALthough I won't have it today (tired from work, need to nap soon), I will try to get a source as soon as tomorrow. Thanks for helping. --FlagFreak TALK 03:15, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- Understand that something as far out as a "meat/bun ratio" needs to have proper sourcing to prove that it in fact is not a hoax. If you are willing to provide that, I will gladly restore the article. Tiptoety talk 03:09, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- I have two sources now. I have difficulty in choosing a proper title for the page, though. Can you help me out with this? --FlagFreak TALK 11:54, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
