Talk:FK Vėtra

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject on Football The article on FK Vėtra is supported by the WikiProject on Football, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of Association football related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page; if you have any questions about the project or the article ratings below, please consult the FAQ.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
FK Vėtra is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Lithuania on Wikipedia. To participate simply edit the article or see our to-do list. On the project page we have some tools to help you out. Don't hesitate to ask questions!
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
Comments Please leave a short summary to explain the ratings and to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

Please delete that page because the name of the team isn't correct. The correct team name is FK Vėtra

--Vytis1 05:43, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

No need to delete. It can be simply redirected. Renata3 17:02, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Ačiū, Renata3. Taip pat FK Žalgiris yra nukreipta į FK Žalgiris Vilnius. Turėtų būti atvirksčiai. --Vytis1 19:56, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

And this one ones needs admin first to delete FK Žalgiris. I will make a note on requested moves. But it will take several days. PS. it is better to use English on article talk pages. PPS. good work on sport pages ;) Renata3 17:14, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Until the proponents of such moves exhibit an understanding of the need to fix indexing, which has not been done in the case of this move in which the article has been moved to a different name while the talk page remains under a different name. Gene Nygaard 16:55, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
    • Oh boy. It was not moved. It was simply merged & redirected! After everything is settled, I will redirect the talk page too. Renata 17:22, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Oppose don't see a good reason to move. 18:58, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] From other talk page

I've rewritten the article slightly to make it sound a bit more English and rid it of the grammatical and spelling errors. The general information in the article remains the same as I don't know a thing about Lithuanian football, so I'm relying on the original contributors to get this right. If anyone needs a hand with correcting this again (based on any new information), send me a message. Jamyskis Whisper, Contribs Germany 18:57, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Moved from the article's talk page prior to redirecting talk. —Nightstallion (?) 09:04, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:FK Vetra.gif

Image:FK Vetra.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:33, 13 February 2008 (UTC)