Fixture (property law)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- This article is about the legal concept. For other uses, see Fixture (disambiguation).
This article does not cite any references or sources. (December 2007) Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unverifiable material may be challenged and removed. |
Property law |
---|
Part of the common law series |
Acquisition of property |
Gift · Adverse possession · Deed |
Lost, mislaid, or abandoned |
Treasure trove |
Alienation · Bailment · License |
Estates in land |
Allodial title · Fee simple · Fee tail |
Life estate · Defeasible estate |
Future interest · Concurrent estate |
Leasehold estate · Condominiums |
Conveyancing of interests in land |
Bona fide purchaser |
Torrens title · Strata title |
Estoppel by deed · Quitclaim deed |
Mortgage · Equitable conversion |
Action to quiet title |
Limiting control over future use |
Restraint on alienation |
Rule against perpetuities |
Rule in Shelley's Case |
Doctrine of worthier title |
Nonpossessory interest in land |
Easement · Profit |
Covenant running with the land |
Equitable servitude |
Related topics |
Fixtures · Waste · Partition |
Riparian water rights |
Lateral and subjacent support |
Assignment · Nemo dat |
Other areas of the common law |
Contract law · Tort law |
Wills and trusts |
Criminal Law · Evidence |
In the law of real property, fixtures are anything that would otherwise be a chattel that have, by reason of incorporation or affixation, become permanently attached to the real property. At law, fixtures are treated in the same manner as real property, particularly under the law of security for debt. A classic case of a fixture is a building, which in the absence of language to the contrary in a contract of sale is considered to be part of the land itself and not a separate piece of property.
Some examples of a fixture are obvious - a piece of lumber sitting in a lumber yard is clearly a chattel. However, that same piece of lumber in a fence surrounding real property is considered to be real property itself. However, not all cases are as easy. Is, for example, a trailer home a piece of real property or a movable chattel? In many cases, it depends how permanently the trailer is attached to the land, such as whether the trailer has a foundation.
The discussion is not just academic, and can have real effects on creditors and mortgagors who assume that a given piece of property is a chattel or a piece of real property. In most jurisdictions, the law respecting the registration of security against debt, or proof that money has been lent on the collateral of property, is different for chattels than it is for real property. For example, in the province of Ontario, Canada, mortgages against real property must be registered in the county or region's land titles office. However, mortgages against chattels must be registered in the province-wide registry set up under the Personal Property Security Act.
In the case of a trailer home, whether it is a fixture or chattel has a bearing on whether a real property mortgage applies to the trailer. For example, most mortgages contain a clause that forbids the borrower from removing or demolishing fixtures on the property, which would lower the value of the security. However, there have been cases where lenders lend money based on the value of the trailer home on the property, where that trailer is later removed from the property. Similarly, a chattel mortgage granted to allow a person to purchase a trailer home could be lost if the trailer is later attached to real property.
The law regarding fixtures can also cause many problems with property held under a lease. Fixtures put in place by the tenant belong to the landlord if the tenant is evicted from the property. This is the case even if the fixture could have legally been removed by the tenant while the lease was in good standing. For example, a chandelier hung by the tenant may become the property of the landlord. Although this example is trivial, there have been cases where heavy equipment incorporated into a plant has been deemed to have become fixtures even though it was sold as chattels.
Because the value of fixtures can often exceed the value of the land on which they were affixed, lawsuits to determine whether a particular item is a chattel or a fixture are common. In one case in Canada, a provincial government argued that a huge earth dam was a chattel, as it was only held in place by gravity and not by any type of affixation (the claim was rejected).
In a sale of land, fixtures are treated as part of the land, and may not be removed or altered by the seller prior to the transfer of the land.
[edit] Trade fixtures
An important exception to the usual treatment of fixtures is the category of trade fixtures - chattels installed by a tenant on commercial property specifically for their use in a trade or business. These may always be removed by the tenant, so long as any damage to the structure caused by the removal is repaid or repaired.