Talk:Fitness First
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the United Kingdom. For more information, visit the project page. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
Fitness First is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. | ||
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Malaysia.
This project provides a central approach to Malaysia-related subjects on Wikipedia. |
|
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. | |
I think some reference should be made to Fitness First contracts and how difficult it is to leave the club without incurring heavy fees or direct debits for the rest of your life---
219.90.251.132 (talk) 00:40, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Uhhhhhhhhh... Whatever bright spark decided to add a quote 'known for ripping off members' or other such stupidities, don't. It's idiotic and I've removed it. It's fair enough to talk about contact terms, but it's not ok to make broad sweeping statements like that.
219.90.251.132 (talk) 00:40, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
