Talk:Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article was nominated for deletion on Sept. 8, 2007. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

	Law Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
Low	This article has been assessed as Low-importance on the assessment scale.

	This article is part of WikiProject Illinois, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

	Chicago Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles related to Chicago.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

In law school, I was up for Socratic questioning on this case. I still remember the facts. I think serving successfully as counsel at the Fed Circuit on a case that is in patent law case books (Westlaw) is significant enough to leave the article up. I also agree that this may be notable at least for its Chicago business history connection.

The founding section is weak and should have more citations. I would leave the self-published sources flag up but remove it from the Articles for deletion list. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.105.30.99 (talk) 03:06, 15 September 2007 (UTC)