User talk:Fishhead2100/Archive 1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please make sure you sign your name or else you will be ignored. Only signed messages will be repsonded to.
To talk about general Wikipedia items such as general usage, how to start a page, or if you'd like to leave me a comment, a criticism, a question or whatever then please go to my talk page by clicking here.
| Welcome to the Archive! Please do not edit this page. |
| Archive 1 is wrestling related. Please don't create a new heading for each topic. If your question, comment, or criticism falls under a certain heading please make a subheading. Archive 2 is sports related so please put all sports talk there. Please don't create a new heading for each topic. If your question, comment, or criticism falls under a certain heading please make a subheading. If you'd like to leave me a comment, a criticism, a question or whatever wrestling related please click here. |
Contents |
[edit] A2NWO
I Response to User_talk:NickSentowski#a2nwo:
This article has been voted for deletion and I have only sub-paged it as an archive for merging. I have removed the categories and templates so they should no longer appear in the lists that were questionable before. Thank you for catching them for me!!!
-NickSentowski 21:35, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] ECCW
[edit] Deleting ECCW page
Unfortunately I cannot delete the page you requested due to the fact that it has a revision history and you are not the creator of the page. If you want the page Extreme Canadian Championship Wrestling roster deleted you need to follow either the WP:PROD or WP:AFD processes. 23skidoo 12:09, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- Sorry for the late response but I was on Wikibreak. About the ECCW roster, I personally made that article a redirect after a discussion I had to make it a redirect to the List of Independent circuit wrestlers. If I remember correctly, I think I took all promotion rosters that was not one of the major promotions like WWE, TNA, etc. I merged them into the article for Independent wrestlers. I don't think the ECCW article existed yet when this happened.
-
- I have removed the prod tag and redid the redirect. I would redirect to the category roster, but since cross-namespace redirects are frowned upon, I wont. And since it's a semi-useful redirect to the list of wrestlers and it has a reversion history, I ain't putting it AFD. — The King of Kings 19:18, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] JAPW
[edit] Logo
Ill try and get in touch with them about getting a Logo image. Shouldn't be too hard. NegroSuave 01:55, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Regarding edits made during August 12, 2006 (UTC) to Jersey All Pro Wrestling
Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. If you had a good reason for blanking the page, please use the edit summary to allow other users to know in future. JD don't talk email me 22:37, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] JAPW
As you removed the PROD I've put it up for deletion at AfD. My problem is that the article does not assert notability, and a long roster list doesn't really help as it just looks like name dropping to make the fed look more important than it is. If you want it to pass AfD I suggest inline refs and more of them, and more third party support not just its own page, any backyard fed can get a homepage and solie page. Prove this fed is important. Darrenhusted 19:44, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] RCW
[edit] RCW Women's Championship
You added some context to RCW Women's Championship, however it could use some additional information about RCW (what is it? where is it? etc.) — ERcheck (talk) 14:53, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Stampede Wrestling
[edit] Category:Stampede Wrestling alumni
The policy says: Occupation categories should not be divided into "current" or "former" categories.
That is the reason. -- ProveIt (talk) 01:07, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- I actually prefer the Alumni name as well. However, the problem is really to do with mirror sites, printed copies and cds. On wikipedia we can update things any time, but once it's printed in a book thats it. Thus they want to avoid any kind of current/former classification scheme. -- ProveIt (talk) 22:04, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
