User talk:Firelord1116

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page has been temporarily protected from editing to prevent this blocked user from causing disruption.

 This page is currently protected from editing to prevent Firelord1116 (talk • contribs • block logauto suspected socks) from using it to make disruptive edits or continuing to abuse the {{unblock}} template.
If you have come here to issue a new message to this user, it means the block has expired. Please unprotect the page, ask an administrator to do so, or request unprotection here.

April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Your Face, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Your Face was changed by Firelord1116 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-04-13T20:46:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:46, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Redvers, you will be blocked from editing. Gwernol 13:35, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Gwernol 13:42, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

If you continue to vandalize this page, I will protect it to prevent your continuing abuse. Thanks, Gwernol 13:57, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Im a nice guy really :("

Decline reason: "That's not the reason for your block. Removing this so we don't have two open at once. — Hersfold (t/a/c) 15:44, 28 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Please give this harmless vndal another chance. I'm sure he will repent. --George C 14:00, 28 April 2008 (UTC)"

Decline reason: "Declined (for now) based on a complete lack of harmless edits and some other suspicious activities (User:Mazzorbo below, for example) Hersfold (t/a/c) 15:52, 28 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

I have offered to unblock Firelord1116 if George cowie is prepared to vouch for the user's future good behavior. Gwernol 14:18, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
I agree. Unblock him. --Mazzorbo (talk) 15:11, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
This being your only contribution to Wikipedia ever, why are you editing here and what basis do you have for suggesting this vandal should be unblocked? I'm afraid that creating sockpuppet accounts makes it less likely we will unblock you, not more. Gwernol 15:22, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Mazzorbo is an admitted meatpuppet and abusive sockpuppeteer, and has been indefinitely blocked from editing. Gwernol 17:58, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
I echo that. I don't know him, to answer User:Gwernol's question, but his former edits show promise. I am confident that we should unblock him. --George C 15:15, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Could you point to these promising former edits? Do you mean when he vandalized Redvers' user page, or when he vandalized mine? Or are you referring to when he blanked the Your Face article, or when he added a nonsense entry to September 21. Every edit made by this account has been vandalism or personal attacks. What exactly do you mean, they "show promise"? Gwernol 15:22, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm also not seeing anything of value here, and have declined the unblock for now. While we're discussing it, however, if you don't know this user, what exactly did you mean by "I take no responsibility" and "Not guilty" in this edit? I'm slightly confused. I'm also curious to see what "shows promise" here. Hersfold (t/a/c) 15:52, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Mazzorbo was not my glovepuppet account or whatever you want to call it, it was probably George Cowies :) Firelord1116 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.108.231.108 (talk) 21:02, 4 May 2008 (UTC)