Talk:First day of issue

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Philately
This article is within the scope of the Philately WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of philately and stamp collecting. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks or check out the Philately Portal.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
High This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Copyright concern

Do we really need three "fair"-use images to illustrate what first day of issue would look like?--Jusjih 08:48, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Probably not. I can't make up my mind which to lose though! One shows "classic" first-day cancel from the 1950s + cachet, one shows modern pictorial first-day cancel, one shows modern British + coin novelty. The Wright Brothers one is probably least-valuable. Stan 14:51, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Yes, we do need the images. They don't crowd the text if I reduce their size a little, and they all have their merit. We have rarely regarded 3 pics as too many for an article - Adrian Pingstone 15:32, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
It's not the three-ness, it's the fair-use-ness that's at issue. There's a rule limiting the amount of fair use in an article, mostly to keep movie fans from reproducing the entire movie in its article, one screenshot at a time. (I'm only exaggerating a little!). Turns out I have 1946 FDC showing the same cancel, and it's got no copyrighted artwork, will scan and upload to commons. Stan 15:57, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your replies. As a stamp collector collecting first-day covers, I will try to find covers that may be better in the public domain in the USA. As works published in the USA through 1963 are in the public domain therein if no copyright notice or renewal, I can get some covers scanned and uploaded.--Jusjih 17:14, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tone

I have added a tone-tag to this article. To me parts of it read like a manual (e.q. "This can happen in several ways: ..."), and parts seems to be quite centred on America, while I think it should be a worldwide view. Hope this explains the tagging. --Dirk Beetstra T C 14:23, 15 April 2008 (UTC)