Talk:First Glasgow
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Do we really need individual articles about First Glasgow routes? Fraslet 15:58, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yes. See: First Glasgow Route 20, First Glasgow Route 56, First Glasgow Route 66, First Glasgow Route 75, SPT Bus Route 65, SPT Bus Route 130(Jacqueline2008 (talk) 18:14, 21 May 2008 (UTC))
[edit] No biased opinions
I also belive any mention of cutbacks and re-regulation must be ammended. As this is looks biased towards the re-regulation of buses. Wikipedia is supposed to give information in a neutralised way. Plus I believe there needs to be facts backing this. --Matthew Forth88.110.166.119 11:19, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Table needs fixing
The overground services table needs fixing, I can't get the last row to be all sky blue?! Can someone have a go at fixing it please. Thanks (Jacqueline2008 (talk) 19:35, 21 May 2008 (UTC))
- Done - I hope it's okay! All that was wrong was that the last speech mark at the end of the last " style="background:#87CEFA" ", was a different type to the other, which Wikipedia didn't like. Quite how I don't know, quite how I noticed it I don't know either!! Arriva436talk 20:32, 21 May 2008 (UTC)