Talk:First Council of Nicaea

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article First Council of Nicaea has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
Archive
Archives
  1. 2004-2007

[edit] exact count

you guys dont have exact number of participants. and that was not even 1000 years ago. its pity :( —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.16.123.194 (talk) 05:26, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Edit: They were 161 for, 157 against! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.179.16.77 (talk) 02:06, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


It wasn't called by the "catholic church" but by Constantine to create a single imperial religion that would unite all the disparate religious groups that existed within the Roman Empire. What the world ended up with was a catholic church that was an amalgam of Sol Invictus (Roman) Mithras (Persian) Judaism (Palestine) with Greek and Northern European belief thrown in to make up something that would be acceptable to everyone throughout the Empire. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.107.0.237 (talk) 10:35, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Please stop with the conspiracy theories. Which is more probable? 1) 200+ people meet somewhere, they debate and argue and yet reach some sort of consensus about what they actually believe and call it a day or 2) that Emperor Constantine bullies/bribes/forces the same 200+ people to shut up while transforming their entire religion beyond recognition, doing this using these 200+ people as a fig leaf and somehow managing to achieve that the same 200+ people and their congregations (many thousands of people) somehow all choose to remain completely silent after returning home from Nicaea? Occam's razor applies. 83.89.43.14 (talk) 10:18, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

BUT BUT I READ DA VINCI CODE AND I HATE CHRISTIANITY WAHHHH —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.212.59.92 (talk) 10:59, 20 May 2008 (UTC)