Talk:First Command Financial Planning, Inc.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Good Article Passed
Well done - a well-written, well-refenced, broad article. With a few more sources, this is a potential FA candidate. ck lostsword|queta!|Suggestions? 11:42, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] First Command Contact
I'm excited... I was contacted via private email by somebody at First Command...they wanted to "correct" some of the mistakes I made (basically changes that have been made since the settlement.) They gave me a bunch of material and data---and I will be going through it to fix the mistakes they pointed out. I'm kind of excited because the person is filling in some gaps that I didn't like. I'm also impressed because the person/company could have made the changes themself, but rather than doing that they are following Wikiguidelines and not editing something about themselves... very cool.Balloonman 19:43, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry it took so long to getting back to this article... it's not at the top of my list and in all honesty it fell into the cracks... and was forgotten. I am, however, committed to seeing it improved.Balloonman 22:12, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] neutral article?
I have concerns about the neutrality of this article. .... there should be a rewrite of the introduction and a major slimming down of the section devoted to the settlement so that the regulatory action is treated in this article in a way that reflects the treatment of similar actions taken against Edward Jones, Merrill Lynch and other financial companies. .... (posted Balance2214 19:32, 21 October 2007 )
[edit] issue resolved
Fixed the neutrality issue by editing the settlement information per my previous posting. Balance2214 19:32, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] GA Sweeps—on Hold
This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed.
1) The lead should be longer—at least two paragraphs.
2) Many statements in the article need citations I marked them with 'fact' tags.
3) Note 1 does not exist. Please, find a substitute.
I will check back in no less than seven days. If progress is being made and issues are being addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far. Regards, Ruslik (talk) 06:49, 9 June 2008 (UTC)