User talk:Financial-Foodie

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:GSBA logo1.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:GSBA logo1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 17:34, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale added

Per your request, I have added this to the image's page. Please let me know if further justification is needed.

Sincerest regards, Financial-Foodie

[edit] AfD nomination of Greater Seattle Business Association

An editor has nominated Greater Seattle Business Association, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greater Seattle Business Association and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 15:59, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

FYI: Good job on adding additional sources to the article. I'm still leaning towards a weak delete, but this really is a borderline case for WP:ORG. I'll look for some references on my own tonight, and will consider changing my opinion on the AfD depending on what I find. However, regardless of my opinion on it, there appears to be little consensus in the AfD for delete at this stage, so I suspect the article will likely survive (I've been wrong before, but that's my opinion). --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 21:53, 19 March 2008 (UTC)