User talk:Finalnight/Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Previous Anonymous contribs:
69.210.252.204
24.245.33.104


Contents

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia. This account was created for you. We hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions or place {{helpme|your question here}} on this page, and someone will be around to help. Again, welcome! --AccReqBot (talk) 21:45, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

You Rock.

Hey there, Finalnight. Thanks for your contribs, especially to 2007 Minnesota Vikings season. On my to-do list for today was adding all the references that you added, but when I went to the article, it was done. Now I don't hafta! You rock. Happy editing, Keeper | 76 22:30, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, I had a very depressing day yesterday, what with the ousting of the Vikes from the playoffs. But really, do I expect much more than heartbreak from these guys? No. Glad you registered for the Wik, it's great fun. Hope you stick around, we need help keeping the football articles (and thousands others) from being trampled by vandals and point of view pushers. I just put two and two together (from your userpage) and now see that you've been contributing all along - kudos to you my friend. Happy editing, Keeper | 76 22:36, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

McDonald's

I didn't re-rate the article, I was cleaning it up and made a cut and paste error. Remember: Assume good faith, which you didn't. --- Jeremy (talk) 18:05, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

responded on user's talk page--Finalnight (talk) 01:16, 21 February 2008 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Chapman LawSchool siteLogo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Chapman LawSchool siteLogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:26, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Responded on image talk page.--Finalnight (talk) 15:52, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

About rollback

You're welcome. :) Just remember it's for vandalism reversion. You may also want to see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. Good luck. Acalamari 02:49, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

patent nonsense?

Hi there, Legally Blonde 2 Full Cast doesn't deserve an article, and should at best be merged with the film. but it's not patent nonsense. Please be careful with the csd templates. +sj + 03:44, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

The version I looked at did appear as nonsense.--Finalnight (talk) 04:37, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Wow, that is... unusual. I should have checked the revisions more closely. Cheers, +sj + 19:24, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Finalnight! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Ale_Jrbtalk 07:50, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

I thank you for fixing that vandalism. I didnt even notice it until just now.--DestructoTalk to me 03:36, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Your anime-only tagging

Now that your AIV report passed, please don't template regular editors, especially with VandalProof. Someone who managed to get rollback rights should know better. I removed your markings because we don't use such things anywhere else, and aren't about to start for the latest round of filler. He is already noted to be part of a filler arc, so there is no reason to add a haphazrd tag in a weird place. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 05:06, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair enough, but, like everything, Wikipedia can educate on filler. Simple links do it all. Plus, tagging on multiple pages when links point to the relevant description is overkill. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 05:15, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

ONE & DONE?

so who wrote ONE & DONE? that isn't vandalism? sounds like CAPS insult to me Enjoisktboarding (talk) 06:11, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

One and done was written by this anon user who I also warned.--Finalnight (talk) 06:14, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Apperances

i think it's really stupid to put every single time the tigers made it to the tournament let alone how they progressed each year. it's meaningless, no other teams page does it, and i'm willing to bet a cry baby fan did it to make his/herself feel better after they got knocked out yesterday in the first round. Unless you go all the way, it doesn't matter. I also think it's unnecessary since it's all written in the grid anyhow..plus it looks really sloppy.. Final four appearances fine, but have the tigers even made the final four ever? Enjoisktboarding (talk) 01:28, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

After I figure out what user is talking about, will respond on their talk page.--Finalnight (talk) 01:32, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

oh i went back and deleted it because it ticked me off lol .. the user will probably slap it back up there. *rolls eyes* Enjoisktboarding (talk) 07:08, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Help with user warning

someone just messaged me about vandalism again and i confronted them (chunky rice).. i had seen the same guy write ONE AND DONE, heh heh again.. but they thought it was me.. do you mind emphasizing that? Enjoisktboarding (talk) 21:20, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Ok, I figured out what you did wrong and messaged you on your page. Try to avoid telling admins to fuck themselves in the future.--Finalnight (talk) 21:41, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Cliffnotes! since this incident was a little hard to understand from the talk pages. I have been informally coaching (Enjoisktboarding) after I had caught him vandalising during a routine rc patrol. He messaged me about what to do about someone warning him unfairly. He did not realize that he was not logged on to WP at the time and was using an IP that had been warned back in august. When he saw the message, he flipped and wrote a personal attack on the warning user's talk page, who happened to be an admin. I then advised him to remove comment and apologize. Moral of the story folks: Don't jump to conclusions and assume good faith before you go off telling admins to go fuck themselves.--Finalnight (talk) 02:00, 24 March 2008 (UTC)