User talk:Finalnight

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hit the wall Finalnight is currently wikibonked and is operating at a lower edit level than usual. Hitting the wall is a temporary condition, and the user should return to normal edit levels in time.
Archive
Archives
Archive 1 (12/31/07-03/23/08)


Contents

[edit] USNWR law school rankings

Are they actually out yet? I saw they were leaked but have they actually been published or released by US News & World Report? --ElKevbo (talk) 18:17, 26 March 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Re: Zero no Tsukaima

It has nothing to do with WP:OWN, but it does have to do with differing opinions in how to structure articles and what things work better than others. But I do agree that the automatic "ongoing" field is misleading, and after I noticed that I was thinking to revert it myself. However, I still am firm in the belief in that if something is unknown, it doesn't help anyone to say such, as a complete lack of information will show that anyway. Things like "A third season of Zero no Tsukaima has been announced. It is unknown at this time when it will air." which popped up around the time it was announced.--十八 01:49, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Seems okay to me.--十八 01:51, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Copyrighted material

Next time, please do not link to copyright violations - You may link to copyrighted material as long as it is being used legally. The edit you made on 06:59, 8 January 2008 to InuYasha included a link to a scanlation site. As per Wikipedia:Copyrights#Linking_to_copyrighted_works that is not permitted on Wikipedia. WhisperToMe (talk) 00:23, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] My Warning

Did I really vandalize? If I didn't, is that why you removed the template?--RyRy5 (talk) 06:32, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

It's OK. That almost happened to me about a month ago. Just be careful with that tool. Misuse can lead to it being removed. Comments?--RyRy5 (talk) 06:36, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Well, I sometimes revert vandals a little to fast. But I make sure I'm using rollback at the right place and if it really is vandalism I'm reverting. Sometimes it is hard to tell if a user's edit is vandalism.--RyRy5 (talk) 06:41, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
No prob. If you have any questions, just ask. Also, I noticed your a baseball fan. Care to join the following invite?
 Please accept this invite to join the Red Sox WikiProject, a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles associated with the Boston Red Sox. Simply click here to accept!

--RyRy5 (talk) 06:45, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Yeah. Well, I'm happy that Justin Masterson, an article I created, made his MLB debut today. Yay! Anyway, if you want to see the entire MLB Standing of 2008, copy the following code.{| class="navbox collapsible collapsed" style="text-align: left; border: 0px; margin-top: 0.2em;" |- ! style="background-color: #DeepSkyBlue;" | MLB Standings 2008 |- | <div align="left">{{User:RyRy5/Standings}}</div> |}

--RyRy5 (talk) 06:51, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Good work

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
You have beaten me to more than a couple reverts tonight. Keep up the good work. Trusilver 07:04, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Jump SQ.

I'm very sorry, didn't mean to make a argue. Alhtough i would like you to find a source first. I wan't to give this article a GA rating. You are free to edit the article, all i'm saying is it needs a source. – 「ＪＵＭＰＧＵＲＵ」@Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 20:31, 25 April 2008 (UTC) P.S. Your contribution will go alot better in the Trivia section (just seems out of place in the front) =)

[edit] Your review of Jump Square‎

Hello, I saw that you recently placed Jump Square on hold for GAC. I made some additional comments at the article's talk page, but in short I disagree with your assertion that the article is close to achieving GA-class. If you take another look at the article and the GA criteria, I hope you will agree that a lot of work remains to be done in order for it to pass. The contributors may be able to complete the work in a week's time, but until the issues I have raised are addressed, it does not fulfill the criteria. María (habla conmigo) 18:45, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

I second this disagreement of your passing the article. It falls far short of the GA criteria, including a severe lack of referencing. I have delisted the article and I strongly urge you to become more familiar with GA criteria before doing anymore reviews. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 16:47, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
I totally disagree with your comment about the referencing and have responded on your talk page.--Finalnight (talk) 01:16, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sagara Sanosuke

Thanks, I will make those changes.Tintor2 (talk) 16:58, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Account Creation Interface

You have been approved to use the Internal Account Creation Interface! Some important notes before you get started:

  1. Abuse of the interface is not tolerated, and access can be revoked by an interface admin at a moment's notice
  2. You should ask an administrator for the "accountcreator" usergroup, which overrides the 6 account creations/day limit. However, this usergroup too can be removed by any Wiki admin at a moment's notice if abused.

Now that you have read the generic warnings, please read (or re-read if you have read it already) the tool's documentation page which includes a link to the tool's request-filling interface. If you ever need any help, I myself am an interface admin, so feel free to drop me a line on my talk page! --FastLizard4 (Talk•Index•Sign) 02:21, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Firearms

Welcome to the WikiProject Firearms. I hope you enjoy being a member.--LWF (talk) 14:57, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Acct Creator

done. Chrislk02 Chris Kreider 15:13, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Careful

I'm not trying to tell you off or anything, cos this one caught a fair few of us off guard, but just take another look at this, and think to yourself what the abbreviation of that request's username is. Don't worry about it - I reckon the email address is invalid, and the account has now also been blocked. This note is just to say "watch out" - it's getting harder to spot. Looking down your list of requests ([1]) though, it looks like you've done some good work! I'm sure a fair few newcomers will be grateful to you. :-) Stwalkerster [ talk ] 20:32, 11 June 2008 (UTC)