Talk:Final Fantasy IV (Nintendo DS)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

Contents

[edit] Interview

If someone wants to add something, here's an English interview with lots of nifty details. Kariteh 17:48, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] E3 News

Has there been any new news on this mentioned at E3 this last week. I've been looking, but i haven't really been able to find anything new. I was hoping there would be some new info, or at least an NA release date revealed this week.The Great Morgil 19:58, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

It wasn't part of the E3 line-up, I'm afraid. EvilRedEye 19:38, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Is this DS exclusive?

the PSP article of FF wikia has FFIV: 20th FF anniversary on list. someone please confirm this. http://finalfantasy.wikia.com/wiki/PSP WizzieBlue 03:30, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Sounds like wishful thinking -- the person added it back in May, and no game sites that I know at least reported it. ♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ 11:30, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
I agree. I see no chance that a random poster from a Wiki would know of this months in advance of sites like IGN, Gamespot etc. It has also been removed and was likely simply subtle vandalism. --67.71.77.222 22:30, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Recent Updates

I don't do much with wikipedia, but if anyone regularly checks this, you can update it with some of the new screenshots and CG that have been released through Famitsu. A few online sites have the new stuff. Some of the screenshots show how the dual-screen will be put to use. 156.56.194.113 05:40, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:FFIVDS.JPG

Image:FFIVDS.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 15:01, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use fixed by PresN. — Blue。 19:01, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Merger proposal

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The result was No merge. — Blue。 17:41, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

I think this should be merged with the original Final Fantasy IV article because at this time there is no need for a whole separate article.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.162.54.127 (talk • contribs) 15:34, 25 May 2007

I disagree. There seems to be enough information to warrant a separate article. It is pretty much a separate piece of software, rather than just a port. (EvilRedEye 16:02, 1 June 2007 (UTC))

Merge. I see no need for a separate article for the same game on a different system. KyuuA4 07:38, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
It's the same game, but it's hugely remade. Considering there is going to be not only the complete graphical overhaul, voice actor addition, and most likely at least some gameplay changes due to it being on DS, it's ALSO going to have a lot of extra main story content. So why should it be merged again? ♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ 11:35, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Alright, I'll retract on grounds to retain the featured status of the main FF4 article. As for the 75% of the missing story, naturally that'll have to wait. However, I have to express concern regarding "future" remakes and separate articles for those games. KyuuA4 04:46, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
I for one don't believe it'll be 75%, and think that's a large misconception on what was said and/or meant, but at the moment it IS what reliable sources say. And it really depends -- games like this are different enough that a different article is warrented, simply because keeping it all as one would either kill too much info, or make the page too long. ♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ 10:41, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
No merge: per Melodia. Notable enough for a separate article. Why? A separate article can convey every reputable information on game development, additional plot, and reception of the newer game. — Blue。 19:45, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
No merge: Same here. I believe Melodia says it all. And we would end up making a separate article later anyway, once more info is released. HeroOfVirtue 23:02, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Final Fantasy IV DS JP boxart.JPG

Image:Final Fantasy IV DS JP boxart.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:22, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Verb tenses

Since this game has been out for some time in Japan, I think all occurrances of future tense within this article should be changed to present tense. Kouban (talk) 05:42, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

I agree, it would future-proof the article if nothing else. EvilRedEye (talk) 16:29, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Finally, a US release!

I just got the latest issue of NP mag, and not only does it have a full cover article on the game, complete with developer interview, but also list the date as "7/08". No specific date, just the month, but at least we now know it's coming. —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Great Morgil (talk • contribs) 02:18, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Does Nintendo Power count as a "reliable" source by Wiki standards? Sir Chocobo (talk) 22:33, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

There was never any problem with it before. Besides, by now a lot of other websites are all saying the same 7/08 date by now.

On a slightly different note, could somebody add the date to the box on the right side? I don't know how to change that thing. I'd change it if i could. The Great Morgil (talk) 02:26, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Voice actor list

All Final Fantasy game articles contain information on the voice actors who portray characters where appropriate. In Final Fantasy articles with extensive 'Character' sections the information goes there (or in the relevant split article) but there is no such thing for Final Fantasy IV. The lack of a voice actor list in the article for FFX is given as a reason for removing the list for this article in an edit summary but this information is contained in Characters of Final Fantasy X and X-2 in list format. I don't mind if this information is presented in a different way but I don't think there's any justification for removing it from the article wholesale. EvilRedEye (talk) 00:06, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

In all honesty it's an ugly section solo. It would be better off having the Audio portion merged with Development, and the list placed on the right side of the page in-line with the development section until a more expansive audio section can be created.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 04:24, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Yes, I see that FFX cleanly does it, while this article doesn't really do it carefully at all and just makes a mess with it. If you want to make it different, make it different, don't just leave a messy list up there. - A Link to the Past (talk) 08:39, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
It's probably worth mentioning that since the game'll be out in the West before too long, it's probably a good idea to make sure that whatever change we make is 'future-proof', there's no point in having to have this discussion again once data on the English voice actors is added. EvilRedEye (talk) 13:08, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
I've edited the table so it more closely resembles the one for FFX. Thoughts? I'm not sure its really necessary to include the characters' full names. EvilRedEye (talk) 17:48, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
i think it looks fine, and it was a good idea to leave a list for when the english version arrives. there was also no reason to remove this - many of the voice actors there are prolific or professional talents from japan, and it was also mentioned a few times in the official game blog. removing it for being 'ugly' wasn't a good reason, or had anything to do with wiki's standards for quality.92.0.45.112 (talk) 15:28, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] European release date

The citation for the European release date is the listing from an online retailer. Is this a reliable source, as I thought retailers often just stick up a conservative estimate so they can start taking preorders. I could have sworn there was some policy or other mentioning the use of online retailers as sources somewhere. EvilRedEye (talk) 13:47, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

I put it up because Play.com is usually quite reliable for giving release dates, ill look for another source to double check later on —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.148.155.245 (talk) 15:19, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Hmph cant find another source with that claim, keep an eye out. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.148.155.245 (talk) 15:30, 9 June 2008 (UTC)