Talk:Final Fantasy Chronicles

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Final Fantasy Chronicles has been listed as one of the Everyday life good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
	Final Fantasy Chronicles is part of the "Chrono series" series (project page), a featured topic identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do.
Article milestones Date Process Result March 11, 2007 Good article nominee Not listed June 16, 2007 Good article nominee Listed September 14, 2007 Featured topic candidate Promoted March 27, 2008 Featured topic candidate Not promoted Current Status: Good article

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Video games     (Rated GA-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. Portal GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale. Low This article is on a subject of Low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0. VG To-do: edit  Peer review: Video game, Crash of the Titans, Xbox Live Arcade, List of Final Fantasy compilation albums, Metal Gear Solid, Shigeru Miyamoto, The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess‎, Myst III: Exile, Blade Runner, Zanac, Warhawk (PlayStation 3 game) Cleanup: List of characters from The King of Fighters, Hellgate: London, LeChuck Featured article candidates: List of songs in Guitar Hero Encore: Rocks the 80s (FLC), Halo (series), List of Sega 32X games (FLC), Alleyway Good article nominations: Ayu Tsukimiya, Music of the Final Fantasy Tactics series, Super Smash Bros., Music of Final Fantasy XI, Day of Defeat: Source Article status review: GA Review – None; FA Review – The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask, 3D Monster Maze; FT Review – Final Fantasy titles Articles for Deletion: Participate in video game related deletion discussions. Images: Add box-art and screenshots to articles. Make sure to include a valid non-free use rationale. Monitor the following related changes pages: changes to WP:VG and changes to this to-do list. Announce your new articles Sign up for the new VG Newsletter. WikiProject Square Enix     (Rated GA-Class)   (Rated Low priority) This article is part of WikiProject Square Enix, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Square Enix-related merchandise and video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale. Low This article is on a subject of Low priority within Square Enix-related articles for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0. WikiProject Final Fantasy (Rated GA-Class) This article is part of WikiProject Final Fantasy, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Final Fantasy-related merchandise and video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale. Low This article is on a subject of Low priority within Final Fantasy-related articles for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0.

To-do list for Final Fantasy Chronicles:	edit · history · watch · refresh
FA!

Contents 1 Erroneous copied text? 2 Failed GA 3 GA review 4 2nd GA Review

[edit] Erroneous copied text?

Some of the text on this page is copied directly from the Final Fantasy Anthology page, leading to some nonsense in the second-to-last paragraph in the first section:

"Final Fantasy Chronicles didn't have a seemingly endless supply..." "The game went quickly out of print, however, especially as Final Fantasy Chronicles was released..." (paraphrases)

Can this be revised or removed?

Arkaaito 17:56, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Failed GA

This article has failed the GA noms, due as it lack to talk more about what bonus features this game includes. You may also seek a review of the decision if you feel there was a mistake. Tarret 14:35, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Asked for review :) Judgesurreal777 01:39, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA review

The development section mentions bonus features as existing. The reviewer asks for expansion on what those bonus features were. While the original review seems woefully inadequate, especially since it gives no guidance as to how to actually make this article a GA, the article still should be failed based on the following fixes needed:

• Criteria 2 (referencing and accuracy): Last paragraph of "reception" is unreferenced.
• Criteria 3 (broadness): This is the real problem. The article teases content, but says very little. It mentions changes from earlier releases, without delving into what those changes were. It mentions bonus features, but never mentions what they were. While a synopsis of the entire game is in no way needed, some explanation of the game's features and game play is probably needed. We don't want the entire game runthough, but we should get SOME sense of what the game is and how it is played. See WP:FICT for more ideas on how to expand this article.

• This GA failure of this article has been endorsed per the now archived Good article review. IvoShandor 12:11, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 2nd GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

5. It is stable.

   

6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

   a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

7. Overall:

   a Pass/Fail:

This article looks fine and has passed every aspect of the GA list. If anyone has a problem/comment/question, please reply to this. If not, I will award it GA status in awhile. INFORMATION CENTER (T • C) 19:38, 13 June 2007 (UTC)