User talk:Filll/Anti-creationism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Filll, doesn't being anti-anything limit the neutrality with which you are capable of showing when editing articles? It tends to be very difficult to learn or support anything new, regardless of how correct it may or may not be, if you have already chosen not to accept anything other that that which you already believe. As a scientist myself, I have found that many times, creationists and Christians in general tend to be illogical and resistant to evident truths, but do not think that you are so above them that your bias in the area of Creationism does not carry alarming uncertainties about the rest of your posts. I encourage the editing and adding you do for wikipedia, but do take into account that everything you write or edit is read by others who wish to find only unbiased information. Thanks for any time you dedicated to reading this. Eoheomili (talk) 01:00, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair

Filll, Thanks for being fair and unbiased at a editorial level on the YEC page. This comes from a Calvinist YEC, new-to-WP, maybe, if-you-believe-me ... Nukeh (talk) 04:56, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Context

It was sort of taken out of context... well not sort of. Notice the dots (...) after the quotes. For further reading visit this user page, and the beliefs section. Cheers, AmericanEagle 04:21, 24 April 2008 (UTC)