User talk:Fig wright

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Add your comments to me here!

Contents

[edit] Your comment on the 2006 Israel Lebanon talk page

Re: Seymour Hersh - the last comment at the bottom of that section was at 2am on the 16th (GMT), and it was archived at 1am on the 19th. After rechecking, though, I missed tewfik's comment in the middle. (I just scan the bottom of the sections) Sorry. Iorek85 23:59, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bristol elections

Thanks for doing the extra bits. I'm not too bothered about the results 1995-2006 as they are already online. I want to get stuff online that's not generally available. Do you think I should do Bristol results from the 1970s or do some Avon county results? Andrew

[edit] multiple wikilinking

Hi,

I've been looking at Wikipedia:Only make links that are relevant to the context & the general advice is not to overlink. If you think I've been overzealous on any of the pages let me know & I'll revert my edits. — Rod talk 22:05, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cabot, Bristol

Please have a look here. Thanks - Adrian Pingstone 10:36, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Severn Barrage

Fig wright, I had a look at category:renewable energy and found that most specific entries (wind farms etc.) are categorised in their respective sub-categories

[edit] Re: maps, etc

See Wikipedia:WikiProject Bristol. Thanks, Joe D (t) 18:23, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bristol infoboxes

Hi, I agree the sort of infobox used for Redland, Redland is nice but I don't have the knowledge or skills (or software) to do the local maps (within Bristol & England). They are also non standard boxes which may mean they may not be read by other systems eg Google earth.— Rod talk 12:04, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Steve Comer

I've nominated Steve Comer, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Steve Comer satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Comer and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Steve Comer during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Spartaz Humbug! 18:31, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] On the blanking of user talk pages

I see that you are reverting the deletion of material on other people's user talk pages. But users are allowed to blank their own talk page, as explained here. -- Hoary 09:34, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Response on your talk page. Fig 11:15, 9 August 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:S Hughes 83.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:S Hughes 83.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)