User talk:FERcsI

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Speedy deletion of Aula Chamberchoir

A tag has been placed on Aula Chamberchoir requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Excirial ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 15:42, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

OK, I read the corresponding rules. However, I do not really understand the reason. I think an encyclopedia should contain all relevant information about our age. Choirs, Bands, etc. are among them. I do not really know where are the bounds of this theory. Is it possible to put a contemporary composer into Wikipedia (e.g. Kristoffer Zegers)? And if the composer is a band or a choir? I think these are more important for the world (there is an interest of more people), than some not well known person from the XIV century. Why? Thanks --FERcsI